添加链接
link管理
链接快照平台
  • 输入网页链接,自动生成快照
  • 标签化管理网页链接

We have recently added an external DNS lookup server address in our Link controller under the System --> configuration --> device --> dns --> DNS Lookup Server List

However, when we do a normal nslookup to any url (e.g: google.com), it is unable to resolve the DNS.

    [Active:In Sync] config  dig @8.8.8.8 google.com
    ; <<>> DiG 9.9.6-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 google.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
    [root@23ZLC02:Active:In Sync] config  nslookup google.com
     ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

But LC has external connectivity:

[Active:In Sync] config  ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=3.23 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=3.16 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=4.32 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=7.91 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=3.30 ms

However, it does work if we use the dig command with tcp:

[Active:In Sync] config  dig @8.8.8.8 google.com +tcp
; <<>> DiG 9.9.6-P1 <<>> @8.8.8.8 google.com +tcp
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47990
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;google.com.                    IN      A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
google.com.             299     IN      A       74.125.24.100
google.com.             299     IN      A       74.125.24.139
google.com.             299     IN      A       74.125.24.138
google.com.             299     IN      A       74.125.24.101
google.com.             299     IN      A       74.125.24.102
google.com.             299     IN      A       74.125.24.113
;; Query time: 9 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.853(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Jan 09 21:17:10 SGT 2018
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 135

Here is the TCPDUMP output:

[Active:In Sync] config  tcpdump -ni 0.0 -s0 host 8.8.8.8 and udp port 53
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
19:34:58.297492 IP 203.127.17.5.54771 > 8.8.8.8.domain:  9669+ [1au] A? google.com. (39) out slot1/tmm0 lis=
19:35:03.297323 IP 203.127.17.5.54771 > 8.8.8.8.domain:  9669+ [1au] A? google.com. (39) out slot1/tmm0 lis=
19:35:08.297432 IP 203.127.17.5.54771 > 8.8.8.8.domain:  9669+ [1au] A? google.com. (39) out slot1/tmm0 lis=

Port 53 seems to be open as well:

[Active:In Sync] config  telnet 8.8.8.8 53
Trying 8.8.8.8...
Connected to 8.8.8.8.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.

The network connection flow is Link controller --> IPS --> Router --> Internet

Hello,

 

Regarding your last comment "Port 53 seems to be open as well". It's normal because telnet use TCP only.

 

Can you tell me if you have a Fw between your LC and your ISP. Because as you explain you can reach the google dns trough TCP but not UDP so I suppose that rooting is working fine and this problem can come maybe from perimeter security...

 

Regards,

 

Hi youssef,

 

The only thing is there is an IPS between the LC and the Router (external router facing internet).

 

Unfortunately, we dont have access on both the IPS and Router as they are not being manage by us.

 

Is there other way to test it from LC to see if the UDP/53 is being block?

 

I suppose that you create a wildcard VS on F5 (for outbound traffic). ex: 0.0.0.0:* Can you tell me what protocol did you set (all protocol or just TCP)

 

Regards,

 

Issue accessing web servers through F5 setup on vmware lab environment in Technical Forum unable to ping VIP from server with the F5 as the DGW in Technical Forum Configuring remote authentication fallback on BIG-IP systems does still not work! in Technical Forum GRPC through F5 Virtual Server [RST_STREAM with error code: INTERNAL_ERROR] in Technical Forum F5 LTM request logging via different route domain in Technical Forum