Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine how the experience of the top management team (TMT), such as industrial experience and functional experience heterogeneity, affect corporate social performance (CSP) and whether TMT faultlines act as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach - To examine the effect of TMT experience on CSP, this study uses upper echelons theory as theoretical background, and data are selected from 212 Chinese high-polluting companies with A-shares from 2012 to 2016. The dependent variable is lagged by one year from 2013 to 2017. Findings - Industrial experience both positively influenced CSR and negatively influenced corporate social irresponsibility. Functional experience heterogeneity had an inverted U-shaped effect on responsible behaviors and a U-shaped effect on irresponsible behaviors. Meanwhile, TMT faultlines played a moderating roles in the relationship between TMT experience and CSP, in which faultlines reinforces the non-linear relationship between functional experience heterogeneity and CSP. Research limitations/implications - The existence of impact paths between TMT experience and corporate social performances must still be examined. Other moderators need to be verified. Practical implications - The important ways to promote more corporate responsible behavior and reduce irresponsible corporate behavior is to choose the right team members. During team formation, it is important to have experience in related industries and select team members with different functional experiences. Companies can consider hiring executives who tend to work together and have relevant experience, which can reduce the time cost of unnecessary conflicts. Originality/value - This study combined the upper echelons theory with some attention perspectives to study the impacts of TMT experience on CSP.
File URL:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NBRI-12-2021-0087/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
Download Restriction:
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
File URL:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NBRI-12-2021-0087/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
Download Restriction:
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
File URL:
https://libkey.io/10.1108/NBRI-12-2021-0087?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link
: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
--->
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
search
for a different version of it.
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle:
RePEc:eme:nbripp:nbri-12-2021-0087
. See
general information
about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it
here
. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using
this form
.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your
RePEc Author Service
profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider:
.