The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before
sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal
government site.
The
https://
ensures that you are connecting to the
official website and that any information you provide is encrypted
and transmitted securely.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group.
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
.
N Engl J Med
. 1993;
329
(
14
):977-986. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
2.
American Diabetes Association.
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
.
Diabetes Care
. 2014;
37
(
suppl 1
):S14-S80. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
3.
Bergenstal RM, Gavin JR., III
The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference
.
Am J Med
. 2005;
118
(
suppl 9A
):1S-6S. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
4.
Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, et al.
Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program Study
.
Diabetes Care
. 2011;
34
(
2
):262-267.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
5.
Virdi N, Daskiran M, Nigam S, Kozma C, Raja P.
The association of self-monitoring of blood glucose use with medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating non-insulin treatment
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2012;
14
(
9
):790-798. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
7.
American Diabetes Association.
Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose
.
Diabetes Care
. 1987;
10
(
1
):95-99. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
8.
American Diabetes Association.
Self-monitoring of blood glucose
.
Diabetes Care
. 1994;
17
(
1
):81-86. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
9.
Boyd JC, Bruns DE.
Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose
.
Clin Chem
. 2001;
47
(
2
):209-214. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
10.
Richtlinie 98/79/EG Des Europäischen Parlaments Und Des Rates Vom 27. October
1998. Über In-Vitro-Diagnostika. 1998
[
Google Scholar
]
11.
International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems—requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. EN ISO 15197:2003 E.
12.
International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems—requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO 15197:2013 (E).
14.
Baumstark A, Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, Haug C, Freckmann G.
Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2012;
6
(
5
):1076-1086.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
15.
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Zschornack E, et al.
Evaluation of the system accuracy of 34 blood glucose monitoring systems according to EN ISO 15197
. Poster presented at: ADA; June
8-12, 2012; Philadelphia, PA.
[
Google Scholar
]
16.
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C.
Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2014;
16
(
2
):113-122. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
17.
Hasslacher C, Kulozik F, Platten I.
Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2014;
8
(
3
):466-472.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
18.
Kuo CY, Hsu CT, Ho CS, Su TE, Wu MH, Wang CJ.
Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2011;
13
(
5
):596-600. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
19.
Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, et al.
Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2012;
14
(
4
):1-8.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
20.
Kristensen GB, Monsen G, Skeie S, Sandberg S.
Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2008;
10
(
6
):467-477. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
21.
Essack Y, Hoffman M, Rensburg M, Van Wyk J, Meyer CS, Erasmus R.
A comparison of five glucometers in South Africa
.
JEMDSA
. 2009;
14
(
2
):102-105.
[
Google Scholar
]
22.
Zueger T, Schuler V, Stettler C, Diem P, Christ E.
Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine
.
Swiss Med Wkly
. 2012;
142
:w13631. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
23.
Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Parkin CG.
Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2013;
7
(
1
):144-152.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
24.
Halldorsdottir S, Warchal-Windham ME, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Parkes JL, Simmons DA.
Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American Comparator Trial
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2013;
7
(
5
):1294-1304.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
25.
Klaff LJ, Brazg R, Hughes K, et al.
Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2015;
17
:8-15. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
26.
DeSalvo DJ, Shanmugham S, Ly TT, Wilson DM, Buckingham BA.
Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2014;
8
(
5
):969-973.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
27.
Thorpe GH.
Assessing the quality of publications evaluating the accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2013;
15
(
3
):253-259.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
28.
International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic medical devices—measurement of quantities in biological samples—metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials. EN ISO 17511:2003 (D).
29.
Twomey PJ.
Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640
.
J Clin Pathol
. 2004;
57
(
7
):752-754.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
30.
Genter PM, Ipp E.
Accuracy of plasma glucose measurements in the hypoglycemic range
.
Diabetes Care
. 1994;
17
(
6
):595-598. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
31.
Link M, Schmid C, Pleus S, Baumstark A, Rittmeyer D, Haug C, Freckmann G.
System accuracy evaluation of four systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197 using a glucose oxidase and a hexokinase based comparison method
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2015; [accepted for publication].
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
32.
Freckmann G, Link M, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Haug C.
System accuracy evaluation of 10 SMBG systems with 3 lots each following ISO 15197:2013 against 2 different comparison methods
. Paper presented at: EASD; September 15-19, 2014; Vienna, Austria.
[
Google Scholar
]
33.
American Diabetes Association.
Self-monitoring of blood glucose
.
Diabetes Care
. 1996;
19
(
suppl 1
):S62-S66.
[
Google Scholar
]
34.
Andreis E, Kullmer K, Appel M.
Application of the reference method isotope dilution gas chromatography mass spectrometry (ID/GC/MS) to establish metrological traceability for calibration and control of blood glucose test systems
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2014;
8
(
3
):508-515.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
41.
Boulton AJ, Del PS.
Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: time for reform?
Diabetologia
. 2012;
55
(
8
):2295-2297. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
42.
Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Koschinsky T.
Considerations for an institution for evaluation of diabetes technology devices to improve their quality in the European Union
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
. 2013;
7
(
2
):542-547.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
43.
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, et al.
System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
. 2010;
12
(
3
):221-231. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
44.
Hasslacher C, Kulozik F, Platten I.
Accuracy of self monitoring blood glucose systems in a clinical setting: application of new planned ISO-standards
.
Clin Lab
. 2013;
59
(
7-8
):727-733. [
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
Articles from
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
are provided here courtesy of
Diabetes Technology Society
