2024-01-29T15:24:18.157902803Z 2024-01-29 15:24:18 WARN <_> [io.apicurio.registry.storage.impl.kafkasql.sql.KafkaSqlStore] (KSQL Kafka Consumer Thread) update content canonicalHash, no row match contentId 13 contentHash 6f93522739b215fdd88db69fa59c8c2f70d97e195c6813d89ee6e151840fd5b7
which pointed me to focus my investigation on the source of that log message, the KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader class. This class is responsible for upgrading the canonical content hash of Protobuf artifacts to the correct value. This is needed because we have updated the algorithm we use to compute the hash. Because this class is specific to Protobuf, runs during an upgrade process, and only for KafkaSQL storage, it is our prime suspect.
Secondly, the user was able to provide us with a dump of the kafkasql-journal topic, which was very helpful in discovering how the data went missing [2].
Before I explain what happened, let me first review a few relevant features of Apicurio Registry.
Content Hashes
In Apicurio Registry, artifact content can be addressed by several identifiers, most commonly:
group ID, artifact ID, and version triple (GAV)
global ID, which is unique for every artifact version
content ID, which is unique for every piece of content (sequence of bytes).
In some situations, however, these identifiers are not known up front. For example, the user might want to determine whether a piece of content already exists in Apicurio Registry and find out its identifiers, or create a new artifact version only if the content does not already exist. Therefore, it’s useful to have a way of asking Apicurio Registry about the content itself (sequence of bytes).
To support this feature, Apicurio Registry stores a content hash, which is a SHA-256 hash of the content, in addition to the content bytes. Users can then retrieve the information about a piece of content using only its hash.
However, the content hash does not take the structure of the content into account. The following two Protobuf schemas are semantically equivalent:
syntax = "proto3";
message Error {
string message = 1;
uint32 error_code = 2;
syntax = "proto3";
message Error {
string message = 1;
// Error code must be between 100 and 999 (inclusive).
uint32 error_code = 2;
but they do not result in the same SHA-256 hash. To support searching for content that is equivalent to the input, but not necessarily equal, Apicurio Registry also stores a canonical content hash, which is a SHA-256 hash of the content after it has been converted to a canonical form.
The extended list of identifiers for artifact content in Apicurio Registry is therefore:
group ID, artifact ID, and version triple (GAV)
global ID
content ID
content hash
canonical content hash.
The support for content hashes has evolved across Apicurio Registry versions. For example, in version 2.1.2.Final, we have implemented a canonicalizer for Protobuf artifacts. Before this version, the content hash and canonical content hash were computed using the same algorithm. These kinds of changes require careful consideration and implementation of a special process that executes during Apicurio Registry version upgrades. In the case of the KafkaSQL storage option, this upgrade process is performed by the KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader class.
Artifact References
Apicurio Registry supports many schema types, and some of them allow specifying references to other schemas. For example, Protobuf supports an import statement:
syntax = "proto3";
import "google/protobuf/any.proto";
message Error {
string message = 1;
repeated google.protobuf.Any details = 2;
and JSON Schema has the $ref keyword:
"$id": "https://example.com/schemas/error",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"message": {
"type": "string"
"details": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "/schemas/error_detail"
We have implemented initial support for artifact references in Apicurio Registry version 2.2.2.Final. This feature allows users to specify a mapping between reference name and another artifact version that it points to.
As an example, let’s consider the Protobuf schema above. The import statement value google/protobuf/any.proto is the reference name. If we have already registered the Protobuf file that describes google.protobuf.Any under group ID = default, artifact ID = any.proto, and version = 2, we can then register a Protobuf file that references it by:
Making the following POST request to apis/registry/v2/groups/default/artifacts:
"content": "syntax = \"proto3\";\n\nimport \"google/protobuf/any.proto\";\n\n(...)",
"references": [
"name": "google/protobuf/any.proto",
"groupId": "default",
"artifactId": "any.proto",
"version": "2"
with a special content type header Content-Type: application/create.extended+json, or
using Apicurio Registry client library:
// io.apicurio:apicurio-registry-client:2.5.8.Final
var meta = client.createArtifact("default", "error.proto", "syntax = \"proto3\";\n\nimport \"google/protobuf/any.proto\";\n\n(...)", List.of(
ArtifactReference.builder()
.name("google/protobuf/any.proto")
.groupId("default")
.artifactId("any.proto")
.version("2")
.build()
Content Hashes and Artifact References
As a result of implementing support for artifact references, we wanted to consider two pieces of artifact content that have the same sequence of bytes, but different references as not equivalent. Therefore, we had to change how content hashes are computed. Before version 2.4.2.Final, the following legacy algorithm was used:
content_hash = sha256(content)
canonical_content_hash = sha256(canonicalize(content))
that has changed to the current algorithm:
content_hash = sha256(content ++ references)
canonical_content_hash = sha256(canonicalize(content, dependencies) ++ references)
Similarly to the situation when Protobuf canonicalizer was implemented, these changes also require careful implementation of an upgrade process. The process is currently performed by the ReferencesContentHashUpgrader and ReferencesCanonicalContentHashUpgrader classes. However, they have not been added in the same Apicurio Registry version. More detailed version timeline is described later.
How KafkaSQL Stores Artifact Content
KafkaSQL storage consists of two main components. Every Apicurio Registry instance has its own in-memory H2 database, and connects to a shared Kafka topic named kafkasql-journal. This topic is then used to replicate the state of each in-memory database across instances, and to provide persistence.
When Apicurio Registry is restarted, it consumes all messages in the topic to load the persisted data and bring the instance into sync with any other active Apicurio Registry instances. For more details, see the Resolving a bug in KafkaSQL storage for Apicurio Registry blog post.
For this bug analysis, we will focus on the Kafka messages responsible for replicating artifact content data.
When new content is inserted into Apicurio Registry, KafkaSQL storage produces a new content message on the kafkasql-journal topic. The message has the following structure [3]:
key = {content_id, content_hash} // partition_key = content_hash
value = {operation, canonical_content_hash, content, references}
where operation is one of:
CREATE, which is used when the content is inserted into Apicurio Registry,
UPDATE, which is currently only used by KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader, or
IMPORT, which is used by the export-import feature.
Structure of the content message key is important for determining which Kafka messages can be safely compacted. When Kafka log compaction runs, only the last message with a given key is preserved, and previous messages are deleted. This has the advantage of reducing the size of the topic by removing stale messages, but has the potential of causing problems in case of a bug, as we’ll see later. Apicurio Registry automatically creates the kafkasql-journal topic if it does not already exist, and it configures the topic with log compaction enabled by default.
Version History
Because we suspect that the issue is caused by a bug in the upgrade process for KafkaSQL storage, specifically the KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader, we need to analyze Apicurio Registry versions that contain relevant changes. This helps us understand how the bug was introduced and which versions are affected.
Version 2.1.2.Final
In this version, we implemented the content canonicalizer for Protobuf artifacts [4]. Before this change, canonical content hash for Protobuf artifacts was the same as content hash:
content_hash = sha256(content)
canonical_content_hash = sha256(content)
Protobuf content hashes are now computed using the following algorithm:
content_hash = sha256(content)
canonical_content_hash = sha256(canonicalize(content))
Let’s call these legacy content hash and legacy canonical content hash to differentiate between the current hash algorithm implemented in version 2.4.2.Final.
Version 2.1.3.Final
In this version, KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader is implemented [5], which is responsible for computing legacy canonical content hash for Protobuf artifacts. The upgrader is executed for both SQL and KafkaSQL storage options.
Version 2.2.2.Final
In this version, artifact references are implemented [6]. The algorithm for computing content hashes does not change.
Version 2.4.2.Final
This version changes how content hashes are computed [7], in order to take artifact references into account:
content_hash = sha256(content ++ references)
canonical_content_hash = sha256(canonicalize(content, dependencies) ++ references)
Let’s call these current content hash and current canonical content hash to differentiate between the legacy hash algorithm implemented in version 2.1.2.Final for Protobuf artifacts.
By mistake, KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader was not updated, so it still attempts to change the canonical content hash to the legacy value during Apicurio Registry restart.
ReferencesContentHashUpgrader is implemented to upgrade the legacy content hash to the current content hash in the in-memory database. It’s not executed for KafkaSQL storage option by mistake.
Version 2.4.3.Final
User reports an issue related to content hashes in KafkaSQL. This is fixed in the next version.
This version also fixes a bug in KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader [8], that resulted in an SQL error when the canonical content hash change was being applied:
2024-02-07 13:54:26 DEBUG <> [io.apicurio.registry.storage.impl.kafkasql.sql.KafkaSqlSink] (KSQL Kafka Consumer Thread) Registry exception detected: io.apicurio.registry.storage.impl.sql.jdb.RuntimeSqlException: org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLDataException: Parameter "#4" is not set [90012-214]
resulting in the operation failing, and in-memory database containing the same canonical content hash as before.
Version: 2.4.4.Final
ReferencesCanonicalHashUpgrader is implemented [9] to upgrade the legacy canonical content hash to the current canonical content hash in the in-memory database.
Both References* upgraders are now executed for the KafkaSQL storage option.
Hypothesis
When examining the Kafka topic dump [10], I’ve noticed that for some content IDs, in this case content ID = 2, the only message present is:
"offset": 10,
"key": "\u0002{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"contentHash\":\"b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea\",\"contentId\":2}",
"payload": "\u0002\u0002\u0000\u0000\u0000@59e286281876629c2715b06c8ef294a1d4a713f5e4249d7a3e386bb734f7db90\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000V[{\"groupId\":null,\"artifactId\":\"any\",\"version\":\"1\",\"name\":\"google/protobuf/any.proto\"}]"
which is missing the content bytes (the four bytes \u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 encode the length of the content, which is zero). This means that the previous content messages must have been compacted. How is the message above produced? It is produced by KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader.
We now have the information I needed to formulate a hypothesis about what happened. There are two related bugs:
KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader was not updated to use the current canonical content hash algorithm, so it always attempts to change any Protobuf content that uses current canonical content hash back to legacy canonical content hash after each Apicurio Registry restart. Since the hashes are equal for Protobuf content without references, only Protobuf content with references is affected.
KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader performs the hash change using the following Kafka content message:
key = {content_id = (unchanged), content_hash = (unchanged)}
value = {operation = UPDATE, canonical_content_hash = (legacy value), content = null, references = (unchanged)}
Which has the same content message key as the Kafka message that was used to insert the content. The previous content message might become compacted and the content lost.
Reproducer Scenario
This is a more detailed list of steps that I think should reproduce the problem:
User starts with Apicurio Registry version 2.2.2.Final-2.4.1.Final (inclusive), using KafkaSQL storage.
User adds some Protobuf artifacts with references, let’s call them set A. The content hashes for these artifacts are computed using the legacy algorithm. Therefore, the content message keys contain legacy content hash, and content message values contain legacy canonical content hash. The in-memory database contains the same.
User upgrades Apicurio Registry to version 2.4.2.Final-2.4.3.Final (inclusive).
The KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader is executed. For each Protobuf artifact in the database, it computes the legacy canonical content hash, which is equal to the canonical content hash of set A, so nothing changes. The Reference* upgraders are not executed for KafkaSQL in this version.
User adds some more Protobuf artifacts with references, let’s call them set B. The content hashes for these artifacts are computed using the current algorithm. Therefore, the content message keys contain current content hash, and content message values contain current canonical content hash.
User restarts their Apicurio Registry instance.
KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader is executed again. It’s not necessary to upgrade Apicurio Registry to a later version, because KafkaSQL upgraders are executed every time Apicurio Registry starts. For each Protobuf artifact in the database, it computes the legacy canonical content hash, which equals to the canonical content hash of set A, but not set B. Therefore, it changes the canonical content hash of set B to the legacy value, by sending a content message value that is missing the content by mistake.
Some time later, Kafka compaction runs, which effectively deletes the content of set B. The missing data is only noticed after another restart of Apicurio Registry, when the in-memory database is loaded from the Kafka topic.
User upgrades Apicurio Registry to version 2.4.4.Final-2.5.8.Final (inclusive) [11].
The KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader is executed again.
The ReferencesContentHashUpgrader is executed, which updates any legacy content hash it finds to current content hash, but only in the in-memory database. This currently does not cause any problems, but since content hash is part of the content message key, there is a risk of a potential bug in the future. See Additional bug risk section for more details.
The ReferencesCanonicalHashUpgrader is executed, which updates any legacy canonical content hash it finds to current canonical content hash, but only in the in-memory database. This currently does not cause any problems.
Reproducer
To confirm my hypothesis, I will follow the reproducer scenario above. We can skip steps 1, 2, and 3.1., starting with an empty Apicurio Registry version 2.4.2.Final. We will configure the kafkasql-journal topic with an aggressive log compaction [12].
We will add two Protobuf artifacts, any.proto, and error.proto. The second artifact references the first one.
The following shows abbreviated contents of the CONTENT table in the in-memory database:
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|TENANTID|CONTENTID|CANONICALHASH |CONTENTHASH |CONTENT |ARTIFACTREFERENCES |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|_ |1 |628ccecee09bcc0bcfdc95adce7041e998bb82a7377c600d7dbbba4f70dcae04|bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d|syntax = "proto3"; |null |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |package google.protobuf; | |
| | | | |[...] | |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|_ |2 |b5a276ddf3fc1724dbe206cbc6da60adf8e32af5613ef0fe52fb1dde8da6b67a|b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea|syntax = "proto3"; |[{"groupId":null,"artifactId":"any","version":"1","name":"google/protobuf/any.proto"}]|
| | | | | | |
| | | | |import "google/protobuf/any.proto";| |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |message Error { | |
| | | | |[...] | |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Notice that the canonical content hash value in the second row is b5a276ddf3fc1724dbe206cbc6da60adf8e32af5613ef0fe52fb1dde8da6b67a. This is the correct value that was computed using the current hash algorithm when the content was inserted.
We restart Apicurio Registry, and see the following message in the log, which means that the KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader has been executed:
2024-02-07 12:29:47 DEBUG <> [io.apicurio.registry.storage.impl.kafkasql.KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader] (KSQL Kafka Consumer Thread) Protobuf content canonicalHash outdated value detected, updating contentId 2
The CONTENT table now shows that the KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader updated the canonical content hash to the incorrect legacy value:
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|TENANTID|CONTENTID|CANONICALHASH |CONTENTHASH |CONTENT |ARTIFACTREFERENCES |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|_ |1 |628ccecee09bcc0bcfdc95adce7041e998bb82a7377c600d7dbbba4f70dcae04|bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d|syntax = "proto3"; |null |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |package google.protobuf; | |
| | | | |[...] | |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|_ |2 |59e286281876629c2715b06c8ef294a1d4a713f5e4249d7a3e386bb734f7db90|b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea|syntax = "proto3"; |[{"groupId":null,"artifactId":"any","version":"1","name":"google/protobuf/any.proto"}]|
| | | | | | |
| | | | |import "google/protobuf/any.proto";| |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |message Error { | |
| | | | |[...] | |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"offset": 0,
"key": "\u0000{\"bootstrapId\":\"c613911c-2f32-4a2a-9d79-fffa321f9548\"}",
"payload": null
"offset": 1,
"key": "\t{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"c6758a4e-1c7c-4c68-ad17-0dc99f1cb374\"}",
"payload": "\t{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 2,
"key": "\u0002{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"contentHash\":\"bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d\",\"contentId\":1}",
"payload": "\u0002\u0001\u0000\u0000\u0000@628ccecee09bcc0bcfdc95adce7041e998bb82a7377c600d7dbbba4f70dcae04\u0000\u0000\u0001\u0087syntax = \"proto3\";\n\npackage google.protobuf;\n\noption go_package = \"google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/anypb\";\noption java_package = \"com.google.protobuf\";\noption java_outer_classname = \"AnyProto\";\noption java_multiple_files = true;\noption objc_class_prefix = \"GPB\";\noption csharp_namespace = \"Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes\";\n\nmessage Any {\n\n string type_url = 1;\n\n bytes value = 2;\n}\n\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000"
"offset": 3,
"key": "\b{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"ea335c14-7f1b-40ee-8beb-94ef0b02890d\"}",
"payload": "\b{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 4,
"key": "\u0003{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"artifactId\":\"any\",\"uuid\":\"ecb0a768-617c-4b3d-af1a-3d340c4f2f44\"}",
"payload": "\u0003{\"action\":1,\"metaData\":{},\"globalId\":1,\"artifactType\":\"PROTOBUF\",\"contentHash\":\"bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d\",\"createdBy\":\"\",\"createdOn\":1707303731203}"
"offset": 5,
"key": "\t{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"35a22e8e-f826-4568-8bd8-9d8722a5f25f\"}",
"payload": "\t{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 6,
"key": "\u0002{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"contentHash\":\"b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea\",\"contentId\":2}",
"payload": "\u0002\u0001\u0000\u0000\u0000@b5a276ddf3fc1724dbe206cbc6da60adf8e32af5613ef0fe52fb1dde8da6b67a\u0000\u0000\u0000\u008dsyntax = \"proto3\";\n\nimport \"google/protobuf/any.proto\";\n\nmessage Error {\n string message = 1;\n repeated google.protobuf.Any details = 2;\n}\n\u0000\u0000\u0000V[{\"groupId\":null,\"artifactId\":\"any\",\"version\":\"1\",\"name\":\"google/protobuf/any.proto\"}]"
"offset": 7,
"key": "\b{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"e57510fa-f204-4277-bb5d-7424987737af\"}",
"payload": "\b{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 8,
"key": "\u0003{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"artifactId\":\"error\",\"uuid\":\"b51ca026-3c39-44fd-b22b-6b29478d4477\"}",
"payload": "\u0003{\"action\":1,\"metaData\":{},\"globalId\":2,\"artifactType\":\"PROTOBUF\",\"contentHash\":\"b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea\",\"createdBy\":\"\",\"createdOn\":1707303731454}"
"offset": 9,
"key": "\u0000{\"bootstrapId\":\"d58884b2-6552-4330-9cd3-f3f294a54e4b\"}",
"payload": null
"offset": 10,
"key": "\u0002{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"contentHash\":\"b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea\",\"contentId\":2}",
"payload": "\u0002\u0002\u0000\u0000\u0000@59e286281876629c2715b06c8ef294a1d4a713f5e4249d7a3e386bb734f7db90\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000V[{\"groupId\":null,\"artifactId\":\"any\",\"version\":\"1\",\"name\":\"google/protobuf/any.proto\"}]"
Notice that message 9 is a bootstrap message marking the point where Apicurio Registry was restarted. Message 10 is produced by the KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader.
We will wait for Kafka log compaction to run, and observe the contents of the kafkasql-journal topic again:
"offset": 1,
"key": "\t{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"4c039a9a-62b5-459a-b6da-fc771345de31\"}",
"payload": "\t{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 2,
"key": "\u0002{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"contentHash\":\"bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d\",\"contentId\":1}",
"payload": "\u0002\u0001\u0000\u0000\u0000@628ccecee09bcc0bcfdc95adce7041e998bb82a7377c600d7dbbba4f70dcae04\u0000\u0000\u0001\u0087syntax = \"proto3\";\n\npackage google.protobuf;\n\noption go_package = \"google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/anypb\";\noption java_package = \"com.google.protobuf\";\noption java_outer_classname = \"AnyProto\";\noption java_multiple_files = true;\noption objc_class_prefix = \"GPB\";\noption csharp_namespace = \"Google.Protobuf.WellKnownTypes\";\n\nmessage Any {\n\n string type_url = 1;\n\n bytes value = 2;\n}\n\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000"
"offset": 3,
"key": "\b{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"59fb1cc2-5779-4e39-b089-3272ad8c3b10\"}",
"payload": "\b{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 4,
"key": "\u0003{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"artifactId\":\"any\",\"uuid\":\"7a77789f-d882-4578-b965-1b5050335b05\"}",
"payload": "\u0003{\"action\":1,\"metaData\":{},\"globalId\":1,\"artifactType\":\"PROTOBUF\",\"contentHash\":\"bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d\",\"createdBy\":\"\",\"createdOn\":1707305198467}"
"offset": 5,
"key": "\t{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"33711009-be5c-4491-86e2-d085ba9a39f5\"}",
"payload": "\t{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 7,
"key": "\b{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"uuid\":\"3dd98144-215b-45cf-92f0-e34f09a08a4e\"}",
"payload": "\b{\"action\":1}"
"offset": 8,
"key": "\u0003{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"artifactId\":\"error\",\"uuid\":\"07cc6743-ce36-4258-9fbd-c9c6ec8028d9\"}",
"payload": "\u0003{\"action\":1,\"metaData\":{},\"globalId\":2,\"artifactType\":\"PROTOBUF\",\"contentHash\":\"b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea\",\"createdBy\":\"\",\"createdOn\":1707305199277}"
"offset": 10,
"key": "\u0002{\"tenantId\":\"_\",\"contentHash\":\"b5f276336ecbb160556c114fe22e7cebd8353f0bc11127eb0f69a4aad32648ea\",\"contentId\":2}",
"payload": "\u0002\u0002\u0000\u0000\u0000@59e286281876629c2715b06c8ef294a1d4a713f5e4249d7a3e386bb734f7db90\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000V[{\"groupId\":null,\"artifactId\":\"any\",\"version\":\"1\",\"name\":\"google/protobuf/any.proto\"}]"
Notice that the bootstrap messages at offset 0 and 9 have been deleted, because they are empty (this is on purpose). However, message 6 has also been deleted because it shares the key with message 10. This was not intended and is the bug we need to fix.
After another restart, the Protobuf content with references is missing in the CONTENT table:
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|TENANTID|CONTENTID|CANONICALHASH |CONTENTHASH |CONTENT |ARTIFACTREFERENCES |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|_ |1 |628ccecee09bcc0bcfdc95adce7041e998bb82a7377c600d7dbbba4f70dcae04|bfd6f785126a85ec181c41bc29680b394627c32b7ef0c3e4cef3ced86e463e7d|syntax = "proto3"; |null |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |package google.protobuf; | |
| | | | |[...] | |
+--------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Because the ReferencesContentHashUpgrader does not write the updated content hashes to the Kafka topic in step 7.2., there might be a mismatch between the content hash value in the kafkasql-journal topic and the in-memory database. If Apicurio Registry produced a new content message for a given content ID (for example, to upgrade the canonical content hash, content, or references), the content message key that would be used is different from the one present in the topic, because the key would contain a content hash that has changed.
Currently, the only operation that updates content via content message is the one that KafkaSqlProtobufCanonicalizerUpgrader uses. This operation is always executed before the Reference* upgraders, so it does not cause issues, but it is still a potential bug. To fix this, we would need to change the format of the content message key.
The problem is caused by two bugs in the Apicurio Registry upgrade process that is specific to the KafkaSQL storage option.
You are affected if:
You are using Apicurio Registry 2.4.2.Final or later, and
you are using KafkaSQL storage, and
you have created Protobuf artifacts with references, and
you restart the Apicurio Registry instance (for example during version upgrade).
Symptoms are different based on your Kafka log compaction configuration:
If Kafka compaction runs, some Protobuf artifacts with references might be deleted, and disappear from Apicurio Registry after restart.
If Kafka compaction is disabled, data is not lost, but some Protobuf artifacts with references might have their canonical content hash updated to the legacy version. If you are on version 2.4.2.Final, because of a different bug, the hash change fails to be applied to the in-memory database, so the side effect is avoided at the cost of Reference* upgraders not being present in this version.
If you are affected, you can mitigate the bug using the following steps:
Back up your Apicurio Registry data by either backing up the kafkasql-journal topic directly, or by using the export-import feature.
Disable compaction of kafkasql-journal topic.
Avoid using features that rely on canonical content hash, such as:
Searching for artifacts using canonical content (POST to /search/artifacts with canonical=true query parameter),
Searching artifact metadata by canonical content (POST to /groups/{groupId}/artifacts/{artifactId}/meta with canonical=true), or
Skipping updating of an artifact on duplicate content (POST to /groups/{groupId}/artifacts, with ifExists=RETURN_OR_UPDATE and canonical=true);
with Protobuf artifacts that have references, unless your Apicurio Registry version is 2.4.2.Final.
Do not restart or upgrade Apicurio Registry (if possible), until a fixed version is released [11], and then upgrade directly to the fixed version, skipping any intermediate versions.
Solution
We have released a fixed version 2.5.9.Final🎉. Please update your deployment directly to this version.
Notes
[1] As of the writing of this article, latest Apicurio Registry version is 2.5.8.Final. [Go back]
[2] If you come across a bug that you suspect is related to KafkaSQL, I have written a guide on how to generate a kafkasql-journal topic dump that could help us during investigation. [Go back]
[3] Ignoring multitenancy for simplicity. [Go back]
[4] Commit 42b30af2c4, PR #1973. [Go back]
[5] Commit 03654bb492, PR #2005. [Go back]
[6] Commit dd885c3aae, PR #2366. [Go back]
[7] Commit 9628c43b45, PR #3228. [Go back]
[8] Commit 6dac98fc8a, PR #3300. [Go back]
[9] Commit 67065bfc53, PR #3423. [Go back]
[10] This is an illustrative example, not the actual topic dump provided by the user. [Go back]
[11] We have released a fixed version 2.5.9.Final🎉. [Go back]
[12] To do this, we create the topic manually before starting Apicurio Registry, using the following command:
