You signed in with another tab or window.
Reload
to refresh your session.
You signed out in another tab or window.
Reload
to refresh your session.
You switched accounts on another tab or window.
Reload
to refresh your session.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our
terms of service
and
privacy statement
. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account
This is more of a question than an issue, but wasn't sure where else to ask.
I just got starting working with WMI via C# using FullCLR. I am consuming the Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure assembly since it was describing as being the modern version of System.Management here
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt703458(v=vs.85).aspx
I was trying to look into a CoreCLR version of Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure and heard about the Windows Compatibility Pack, so found myself here. I was surprised to see System.Management instead of Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure in repo, since I thought the former was basically deprecated from link I posted above.
My question is basically should I revert to using System.Management for compatibility with CoreCLR in future, or is there a CoreCLR version of Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure coming? I am new to WMI and would appreciate any clarification.
Good question. I wonder too that WMI instead of MMI was ported to .Net Core.
PowerShell Core depends on MMI and currently uses limited version
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure/
. Tracking Issue
PowerShell/PowerShell#4562
.
/cc
@SteveL-MSFT
We ported System.Management purely to make it easier to port legacy code to.NET Core. We don't recommend new code use it.
@ViktorHofer
could you please check whether MMI has complete functionality on.NET Core?
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/powershell/2018/01/24/powershell-core-6-1-roadmap/
powershell core 6.1 will bring WMI, leveraging .net windows compatibility pack. So this means WMI with powershell core WMI will be built over System.Management rather than MMI? If MMI could be made NetStandard compatible, then maybe it would be useful for powershell team and included in compatibility pack? Maybe then we could get netstandard compatible version of library on nuget to replace
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure/
@czb182
The WindowsPowerShellCompatibilityPack module will be optional. On Windows, the CIM cmdlets are part of the PSCore6 distribution. Not sure if we'll get to porting the WMI cmdlets in 6.1 timeframe as it's turned out to be a much bigger work item than originally anticipated. As for MMI being NetStd compatible, I don't think this is possible as MMI is written in managed C++ which is no longer supported by dotnet.
Also removes dependency on System.Range and RuntimeHelpers.GetSubArray in a simple console app such that they can be trimmed away.
Signed-off-by: dotnet-bot <[email protected]>
Also removes dependency on System.Range and RuntimeHelpers.GetSubArray in a simple console app such that they can be trimmed away.
Signed-off-by: dotnet-bot <[email protected]>