Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting.
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting.
Learn more
/t5/photoshop-ecosystem-discussions/what-s-the-difference-between-quot-export-as-jpeg-or-do-quot-save-for-web-legacy-quot-quot/m-p/11666883#M492990
Dec 10, 2020
Dec 10, 2020
For photographic images, bicubic. For hard edge graphics, if you need to preserve sharp pixel edges, nearest neighbor.
All the Bicubic algorithms have some sharpening built in, the difference is how much. Bicubic smoother has very little, bicubic sharper a little too much and it can easily look oversharpened. Bicubic automatic just switches between smoother for upsampling and sharper for downsampling.
If you're really fussy, you might want to resize to final size first, using bicubic smoother, then sharpen - and only then send it to Export. This way you have full control over sharpening. You don't
have
to sharpen, but any resizing will soften the image and it usually pays off to fine-tune the sharpening if you want maximum impact.
But to answer your question - plain Bicubic (not automatic) is the fallback.
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting.
Learn more