OkHttp是可以说是Android开发中,每个项目都必需依赖的网络库,我们可以很便捷高效的处理网络请求,极大的提升了编码效率。但是有时候,我们使用OkHttp也会遇到这样的问题
崩溃的stacktrace
E AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: OkHttp Dispatcher
E AndroidRuntime: Process: com.example.okhttpexceptionsample, PID: 13564
E AndroidRuntime: java.lang.NullPointerException: blablabla
E AndroidRuntime: at com.example.okhttpexceptionsample.MainActivity$createNPEInterceptor$1.intercept(MainActivity.kt:61)
E AndroidRuntime: at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:112)
E AndroidRuntime: at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:87)
E AndroidRuntime: at okhttp3.RealCall.getResponseWithInterceptorChain(RealCall.kt:184)
E AndroidRuntime: at okhttp3.RealCall$AsyncCall.run(RealCall.kt:136)
E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1167)
E AndroidRuntime: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:641)
E AndroidRuntime: at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:784)
interface Callback {
* Called when the request could not be executed due to cancellation, a connectivity problem or
* timeout. Because networks can fail during an exchange, it is possible that the remote server
* accepted the request before the failure.
fun onFailure(call: Call, e: IOException)
* Called when the HTTP response was successfully returned by the remote server. The callback may
* proceed to read the response body with [Response.body]. The response is still live until its
* response body is [closed][ResponseBody]. The recipient of the callback may consume the response
* body on another thread.
* Note that transport-layer success (receiving a HTTP response code, headers and body) does not
* necessarily indicate application-layer success: `response` may still indicate an unhappy HTTP
* response code like 404 or 500.
@Throws(IOException::class)
fun onResponse(call: Call, response: Response)
OkHttp只处理了IOException的情况,
NullPointerException不是IOException的子类
所以没有被处理,发生了崩溃。
那么有没有办法解决,让这种崩溃不发生,对用户不进行干扰呢?其实是可以的。
使用Interceptor
package com.example.okhttpexceptionsample
import okhttp3.Interceptor
import okhttp3.Response
import java.io.IOException
* 对于Interceptor的intercept中可能出现的Throwable包裹成IOExceptionWrapper,转成网络请求失败,而不是应用崩溃
class SafeGuardInterceptor : Interceptor {
override fun intercept(chain: Interceptor.Chain): Response {
try {
return chain.proceed(chain.request())
} catch (t: Throwable) {
throw IOExceptionWrapper("SafeGuarded when requesting ${chain.request().url}", t)
* 将chain.proceed处理中发生的Throwable包装成IOExceptionWrapper
class IOExceptionWrapper(message: String?, cause: Throwable?) : IOException(message, cause)
上面的代码,我们将任何Throwable
的转成IOExceptionWrapper
(伪装成IOException),然后添加到OkHttpClient中
fun createOKHttpClient(): OkHttpClient {
return OkHttpClient.Builder()
.addInterceptor(SafeGuardInterceptor())
.build()
当我们再次执行有NPE的代码,日志就发生了改变(不再是崩溃的日志,而是异常的日志)
W System.err: com.example.okhttpexceptionsample.IOExceptionWrapper: SafeGuarded=blablabla
W System.err: at com.example.okhttpexceptionsample.SafeGuardInterceptor.intercept(SafeGuardInterceptor.kt:12)
W System.err: at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:112)
W System.err: at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:87)
W System.err: at okhttp3.RealCall.getResponseWithInterceptorChain(RealCall.kt:184)
W System.err: at okhttp3.RealCall$AsyncCall.run(RealCall.kt:136)
W System.err: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1167)
W System.err: at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:641)
W System.err: at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:784)
W System.err: Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: blablabla
W System.err: at com.example.okhttpexceptionsample.MainActivity$createNPEInterceptor$1.intercept(MainActivity.kt:61)
W System.err: at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:112)
W System.err: at okhttp3.internal.http.RealInterceptorChain.proceed(RealInterceptorChain.kt:87)
W System.err: at com.example.okhttpexceptionsample.SafeGuardInterceptor.intercept(SafeGuardInterceptor.kt:10)
W System.err: ... 7 more
上述需要注意两点
添加的是Interceptor,而不是NetworkInterceptor
顺序很重要,一定要放在第一个位置
这么做有什么问题
这么做,当然可以明显增强请求的稳定性和应用的崩溃率。但是是不是也有一些问题呢?比如
将问题情况吞掉,不利于发现问题呢
是的,确实可能存在上述的问题,但是我们可以利用下面的方式减轻或者解决问题
只针对release情况应用SafeGuardInterceptor,这样便于debug情况下更容易发现
针对不同的build variants进行配置,便于尽可能的小范围发现问题
实行更加智能的动态开启策略。
在软件工程中,很多决定都是trade-off的体现,具体的实施方案大家可以自行平衡选择。