添加链接
link管理
链接快照平台
  • 输入网页链接,自动生成快照
  • 标签化管理网页链接
  • Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,Qinghai University,Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Science,Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Adaptive Management on Alpine Grassland,Key Laboratory of Alpine Grassland Ecosystem in the Three-River-Source,Qinghai University,Ministry of Education,Xining 810016,China
  • 摘要:

    为探讨中度放牧条件下放牧方式对家畜生产力的影响,开展了牦牛单牧(YG)、藏羊单牧(SG)、牦牛藏羊1∶6混牧(MG1∶6)、牦牛藏羊1∶4混牧(MG1∶4)和牦牛藏羊1∶2混牧(MG1∶2)5个控制性放牧试验,研究了牧草生长季不同生长时期对家畜日增重的影响以及不同放牧方式对牦牛和藏羊暖季增重、牧草营养和家畜采食量的影响。结果表明:1)在牧草返青期和生长期,牦牛和藏羊的日增重显著大于牧草枯黄期( P< 0.05);2)牦牛和藏羊日增重在不同的放牧方式下无显著差异( P >0.05),而牦牛暖季增重在YG下最高,在MG1∶2和MG1∶6相对较高,藏羊暖季增重在MG1∶2中最高,在SG和MG1∶4相对较高;3)不同放牧方式下牧草营养和单位面积家畜采食量无显著差异( P >0.05),单一家畜放牧单位面积增重SG最高,牦牛藏羊两种家畜混合放牧则MG1∶2单位面积增重最高。综上,牧草枯黄期牦牛和藏羊的补饲对于维持其生产性能具有重要的意义,且MG1∶2对于牦牛和藏羊生产是一种较优的组合生产方式。

    Abstract:

    This research explored the effect of different livestock assembly on livestock productivity under moderate grazing intensity. Five experimental grazing treatments were established: Yak only grazing (YG), Tibetan sheep only grazing (SG), yak and Tibetan sheep grazing mixed 1∶6 (MG1∶6), yak and Tibetan sheep grazing mixed 1∶4 (MG1∶4), yak and Tibetan sheep grazing mixed 1∶2 (MG1∶2). We studied the daily weight gain of yaks and Tibetan sheep at different stages in the herbage growing season and the effects of different livestock assembly on the nutrition, feed intake, and weight gain of yaks and Tibetan sheep in the warm season. It was found that: 1)The daily weight gain of yaks and Tibetan sheep in the pasture re-greening and growing periods was significantly greater than that in the browning-off period ( P< 0.05). 2)There was no significant difference in daily gain of yak and Tibetan sheep under the different livestock assembly ( P >0.05), but the weight gain of yaks in the warm season was highest in YG, and was also relatively high in the treatments MG1∶2 and MG1∶6. The weight gain of Tibetan sheep in the warm season was the highest in MG1∶2, and relatively high in SG and MG1∶4 treatments. 3)There was no significant difference in nutrition and feed intake per unit area of livestock under the different livestock assembly ( P >0.05). When grazing a single livestock class, the weight gain per unit area of SG was the highest, and under mixed grazing of yaks and Tibetan sheep, the weight gain per unit area of MG1∶2 was the highest. In conclusion, supplementary feeding of yaks and Tibetan sheep during the browning-off period of the season is of great significance for maintaining livestock productivity, and the livestock assembly of MG1∶2 was the optimum ratio for mixed grazing of yaks and Tibetan sheep.

    Key words: moderate grazing, different livestock assembly, livestock productivity, Tibetan sheep, warm season grazing, warm season weight gain, daily weight gain

    冯斌, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 刘玉祯, 吕卫东, 张振祥, 孙彩彩, 周沁苑, 王芳草, 于泽航, 董全民. 暖季草场不同放牧方式对牦牛藏羊生产力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(12): 58-67.

    Bin FENG, Xiao-xia YANG, Wen-ting LIU, Yu-zhen LIU, Wei-dong LV, Zhen-xiang ZHANG, Cai-cai SUN, Qin-yuan ZHOU, Fang-cao WANG, Ze-hang YU, Quan-min DONG. Effects of different livestock assembly on the productivity of yak and Tibetan sheep in warm-season pastures[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(12): 58-67.

    Table 2 Average daily weight gain and weight gain in warm season of yak under different livestock assembly

    时间

    Test time

    项目

    Item

    日增重 Average daily weight gain (kg·d -1 暖季增重Weight gain in warm season (kg)
    返青期Rejuvenation period 生长期Growth period 枯黄期Withered period
    2020 YG 0.45±0.05Aa 0.66±0.13Aa -0.09±0.03Ba 22.33±3.84a
    MG1∶6 0.31±0.10Aa 0.34±0.17Aa -0.07±0.03Aa 12.00±6.03ab
    MG1∶4 0.29±0.07Aa 0.17±0.07Aa -0.17±0.09Ba 4.67±2.33b
    MG1∶2 0.41±0.10ABa 0.61±0.23Aa -0.06±0.08Ba 20.00±4.62a
    平均Mean 0.36±0.04A 0.44±0.09A -0.10±0.03B
    2021 YG 0.30±0.05Aa 0.27±0.12Aab 0.00±0.09Aa 13.00±5.69a
    MG1∶6 0.27±0.12Aa 0.35±0.04Aa -0.24±0.03Ba 8.00±2.08a
    MG1∶4 0.33±0.09Aa 0.09±0.01Bb -0.15±0.06Ca 5.00±3.51a
    MG1∶2 0.22±0.12Aa 0.23±0.06Aab -0.14±0.13Aa 6.67±3.48a
    平均Mean 0.28±0.04A 0.23±0.04A -0.14±0.05B
    2022 YG 0.57±0.15Aa 0.25±0.03ABa 0.00±0.17Ba 11.00±2.52a
    MG1∶6 0.63±0.03Aa 0.35±0.02ABa -0.15±0.28Ba 11.33±3.84a
    MG1∶4 0.60±0.17Aa 0.21±0.07Aa -0.42±0.09Ba 3.67±2.33a
    MG1∶2 0.70±0.10Aa 0.25±0.08Ba -0.35±0.13Ca 6.67±1.86a
    平均Mean 0.63±0.06A 0.27±0.03B -0.23±0.09C

    表2 不同放牧方式下牦牛日增重和暖季增重

    Table 2 Average daily weight gain and weight gain in warm season of yak under different livestock assembly

    时间

    Test time

    项目

    Item

    日增重 Average daily weight gain (kg·d -1 暖季增重Weight gain in warm season (kg)
    返青期Rejuvenation period 生长期Growth period 枯黄期Withered period
    2020 YG 0.45±0.05Aa 0.66±0.13Aa -0.09±0.03Ba 22.33±3.84a
    MG1∶6 0.31±0.10Aa 0.34±0.17Aa -0.07±0.03Aa 12.00±6.03ab
    MG1∶4 0.29±0.07Aa 0.17±0.07Aa -0.17±0.09Ba 4.67±2.33b
    MG1∶2 0.41±0.10ABa 0.61±0.23Aa -0.06±0.08Ba 20.00±4.62a
    平均Mean 0.36±0.04A 0.44±0.09A -0.10±0.03B
    2021 YG 0.30±0.05Aa 0.27±0.12Aab 0.00±0.09Aa 13.00±5.69a
    MG1∶6 0.27±0.12Aa 0.35±0.04Aa -0.24±0.03Ba 8.00±2.08a
    MG1∶4 0.33±0.09Aa 0.09±0.01Bb -0.15±0.06Ca 5.00±3.51a
    MG1∶2 0.22±0.12Aa 0.23±0.06Aab -0.14±0.13Aa 6.67±3.48a
    平均Mean 0.28±0.04A 0.23±0.04A -0.14±0.05B
    2022 YG 0.57±0.15Aa 0.25±0.03ABa 0.00±0.17Ba 11.00±2.52a
    MG1∶6 0.63±0.03Aa 0.35±0.02ABa -0.15±0.28Ba 11.33±3.84a
    MG1∶4 0.60±0.17Aa 0.21±0.07Aa -0.42±0.09Ba 3.67±2.33a
    MG1∶2 0.70±0.10Aa 0.25±0.08Ba -0.35±0.13Ca 6.67±1.86a
    平均Mean 0.63±0.06A 0.27±0.03B -0.23±0.09C
    Table 4 Correlation between weight gain during warm season and average daily weight gain of yak during pasture growth season under different livestock assembly

    年份

    Year

    放牧方式

    Livestock

    assembly

    返青期

    Rejuvenation

    period

    生长期

    Growth

    period

    枯黄期

    Withered

    period

    2020 YG 0.56 0.90 0.07
    MG1∶6 0.88 1.00* -0.10
    MG1∶4 -0.93 0.90 0.79
    MG1∶2 -0.99 0.93 0.33
    2021 YG 0.26 0.99 0.97
    MG1∶6 0.96 -0.96 0.91
    MG1∶4 0.97 0.99 0.96
    MG1∶2 0.15 -0.09 0.97
    2022 YG 0.23 0.60 0.68
    MG1∶6 -0.95 -0.95 0.99*
    MG1∶4 0.00 0.80 0.80
    MG1∶2 0.99 -0.36 0.72

    表4 不同放牧方式下牦牛暖季增重与牧草各生长时期牦牛日增重的相关性

    Table 4 Correlation between weight gain during warm season and average daily weight gain of yak during pasture growth season under different livestock assembly

    年份

    Year

    放牧方式

    Livestock

    assembly

    返青期

    Rejuvenation

    period

    生长期

    Growth

    period

    枯黄期

    Withered

    period

    2020 YG 0.56 0.90 0.07
    MG1∶6 0.88 1.00* -0.10
    MG1∶4 -0.93 0.90 0.79
    MG1∶2 -0.99 0.93 0.33
    2021 YG 0.26 0.99 0.97
    MG1∶6 0.96 -0.96 0.91
    MG1∶4 0.97 0.99 0.96
    MG1∶2 0.15 -0.09 0.97
    2022 YG 0.23 0.60 0.68
    MG1∶6 -0.95 -0.95 0.99*
    MG1∶4 0.00 0.80 0.80
    MG1∶2 0.99 -0.36 0.72
    Table 5 Average daily weight gain and weight gain in warm season of Tibetan sheep under different livestock assembly

    年份

    Year

    项目

    Item

    日增重 Average daily weight gain (kg·d -1 暖季增重Weight gain in warm season (kg)
    返青期Rejuvenation period 生长期Growth period 枯黄期Withered period
    2020 SG 0.10±0.01ABa 0.19±0.05Aa 0.02±0.01Ba 6.50±1.50a
    MG1∶6 0.12±0.04ABa 0.17±0.03Aa 0.01±0.03Ba 6.28±1.15a
    MG1∶4 0.09±0.02ABa 0.19±0.04Aa 0.03±0.01Ba 7.08±1.69a
    MG1∶2 0.13±0.02Ba 0.23±0.01Aa 0.01±0.03Ca 8.17±1.20a
    平均Mean 0.11±0.01B 0.19±0.02A 0.02±0.01C
    2021 SG 0.14±0.02Aa 0.05±0.03Ba 0.03±0.01Ba 5.00±1.32a
    MG1∶6 0.09±0.01Aa 0.05±0.01Aa -0.02±0.01Bb 2.33±0.26b
    MG1∶4 0.11±0.01Aa 0.06±0.01Ba 0.01±0.01Cab 3.83±0.17ab
    MG1∶2 0.14±0.03Aa 0.08±0.01ABa 0.03±0.01Ba 5.50±0.29a
    平均Mean 0.12±0.01A 0.06±0.01B 0.01±0.01C
    2022 SG 0.33±0.09Aa 0.13±0.03ABa 0.03±0.07Ba 6.50±0.76a
    MG1∶6 0.43±0.03Aa 0.07±0.02Ba -0.01±0.02Ca 5.61±0.87a
    MG1∶4 0.33±0.07Aa 0.08±0.01Ba 0.00±0.03Ba 4.92±0.08a
    MG1∶2 0.35±0.06Aa 0.09±0.01Ba -0.10±0.05Ca 3.83±1.30a
    平均Mean 0.36±0.03A 0.09±0.01B -0.02±0.03C

    表5 不同放牧方式下藏羊日增重和暖季增重

    Table 5 Average daily weight gain and weight gain in warm season of Tibetan sheep under different livestock assembly

    年份

    Year

    项目

    Item

    日增重 Average daily weight gain (kg·d -1 暖季增重Weight gain in warm season (kg)
    返青期Rejuvenation period 生长期Growth period 枯黄期Withered period
    2020 SG 0.10±0.01ABa 0.19±0.05Aa 0.02±0.01Ba 6.50±1.50a
    MG1∶6 0.12±0.04ABa 0.17±0.03Aa 0.01±0.03Ba 6.28±1.15a
    MG1∶4 0.09±0.02ABa 0.19±0.04Aa 0.03±0.01Ba 7.08±1.69a
    MG1∶2 0.13±0.02Ba 0.23±0.01Aa 0.01±0.03Ca 8.17±1.20a
    平均Mean 0.11±0.01B 0.19±0.02A 0.02±0.01C
    2021 SG 0.14±0.02Aa 0.05±0.03Ba 0.03±0.01Ba 5.00±1.32a
    MG1∶6 0.09±0.01Aa 0.05±0.01Aa -0.02±0.01Bb 2.33±0.26b
    MG1∶4 0.11±0.01Aa 0.06±0.01Ba 0.01±0.01Cab 3.83±0.17ab
    MG1∶2 0.14±0.03Aa 0.08±0.01ABa 0.03±0.01Ba 5.50±0.29a
    平均Mean 0.12±0.01A 0.06±0.01B 0.01±0.01C
    2022 SG 0.33±0.09Aa 0.13±0.03ABa 0.03±0.07Ba 6.50±0.76a
    MG1∶6 0.43±0.03Aa 0.07±0.02Ba -0.01±0.02Ca 5.61±0.87a
    MG1∶4 0.33±0.07Aa 0.08±0.01Ba 0.00±0.03Ba 4.92±0.08a
    MG1∶2 0.35±0.06Aa 0.09±0.01Ba -0.10±0.05Ca 3.83±1.30a
    平均Mean 0.36±0.03A 0.09±0.01B -0.02±0.03C
    Table 7 The correlation between weight gain in warm season and average daily weight gain of Tibetan sheep in each growing season of pasture under different livestock assembly

    年份

    Year

    放牧方式

    Livestock assembly

    返青期

    Rejuvenation period

    生长期

    Growth period

    枯黄期

    Withered period

    2020 SG 0.50 0.94 0.87
    MG1∶6 -0.39 0.82 1.00*
    MG1∶4 0.94 1.00* 1.00*
    MG1∶2 0.97 0.54 0.99
    2021 SG 1.00** 0.93 0.19
    MG1∶6 -0.98 0.45 0.55
    MG1∶4 0.50 0.87 -0.50
    MG1∶2 0.24 0.50 0.00
    2022 SG 0.18 -0.68 0.95
    MG1∶6 0.97 0.98 1.00**
    MG1∶4 0.98 -0.50 -1.00**
    MG1∶2 0.99* -0.83 0.99*

    表7 不同放牧方式下藏羊暖季增重与牧草各生长时期藏羊日增重的相关性

    Table 7 The correlation between weight gain in warm season and average daily weight gain of Tibetan sheep in each growing season of pasture under different livestock assembly

    年份

    Year

    放牧方式

    Livestock assembly

    返青期

    Rejuvenation period

    生长期

    Growth period

    枯黄期

    Withered period

    2020 SG 0.50 0.94 0.87
    MG1∶6 -0.39 0.82 1.00*
    MG1∶4 0.94 1.00* 1.00*
    MG1∶2 0.97 0.54 0.99
    2021 SG 1.00** 0.93 0.19
    MG1∶6 -0.98 0.45 0.55
    MG1∶4 0.50 0.87 -0.50
    MG1∶2 0.24 0.50 0.00
    2022 SG 0.18 -0.68 0.95
    MG1∶6 0.97 0.98 1.00**
    MG1∶4 0.98 -0.50 -1.00**
    MG1∶2 0.99* -0.83 0.99*

    项目

    Item

    ADF

    (g·kg -1

    NDF

    (g·kg -1

    CP

    (g·kg -1

    FI

    (g·m -2

    YG 452.5±7.9b 745.6±0.5a 95.6±2.5ab 28.0±8.4a
    SG 469.6±5.3ab 738.8±2.2a 97.8±1.5ab 31.6±11.1a
    MG1∶6 452.2±4.7b 740.5±3.9a 92.8±3.8b 33.3±7.2a
    MG1∶4 480.2±5.7a 740.3±7.6a 99.8±1.5ab 21.3±7.6a
    MG1∶2 456.8±13.0ab 740.1±5.8a 101.0±0.8a 43.8±5.1a

    表8 不同放牧方式对牧草营养和家畜采食量的影响

    Table 8 Effects of different livestock assembly on vegetation nutrition and feed intake

    项目

    Item

    ADF

    (g·kg -1

    NDF

    (g·kg -1

    CP

    (g·kg -1

    FI

    (g·m -2

    YG 452.5±7.9b 745.6±0.5a 95.6±2.5ab 28.0±8.4a
    SG 469.6±5.3ab 738.8±2.2a 97.8±1.5ab 31.6±11.1a
    MG1∶6 452.2±4.7b 740.5±3.9a 92.8±3.8b 33.3±7.2a
    MG1∶4 480.2±5.7a 740.3±7.6a 99.8±1.5ab 21.3±7.6a
    MG1∶2 456.8±13.0ab 740.1±5.8a 101.0±0.8a 43.8±5.1a

    项目

    Item

    2020 2021 2022

    平均

    Mean

    YG 85.90±14.79a 50.00±21.87a 42.31±9.68b 59.40±9.37ab
    SG 76.47±17.65a 58.82±15.56a 76.47±8.99a 70.59±10.80a
    MG1∶6 65.36±15.58a 28.95±2.63a 59.21±2.74ab 51.17±3.97ab
    MG1∶4 55.00±7.64a 33.89±6.55a 38.89±3.64b 42.59±3.58b
    MG1∶2 84.50±13.25a 41.09±9.43a 33.33±10.26b 52.97±6.64ab

    表9 单位面积家畜增重

    Table 9 Livestock productivity per unit area (kg·hm-2)

    项目

    Item

    2020 2021 2022

    平均

    Mean

    YG 85.90±14.79a 50.00±21.87a 42.31±9.68b 59.40±9.37ab
    SG 76.47±17.65a 58.82±15.56a 76.47±8.99a 70.59±10.80a
    MG1∶6 65.36±15.58a 28.95±2.63a 59.21±2.74ab 51.17±3.97ab
    MG1∶4 55.00±7.64a 33.89±6.55a 38.89±3.64b 42.59±3.58b
    MG1∶2 84.50±13.25a 41.09±9.43a 33.33±10.26b 52.97±6.64ab
    者玉琦, 武志娟, 王吉坤, 钟金城, 柴志欣, 信金伟. 基于mtDNA COX3 基因对西藏特色牦牛群体遗传结构的分析 [J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 231-240. 周力, 侯生珍, 王志有, 杨葆春, 韩丽娟, 桂林生. 棕榈粕替代部分玉米对藏羊母羊小肠形态发育、消化酶活性及抗氧化功能的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(3): 118-127. 聂洪辛, 李毓敏, 庞凯悦, 柴沙驼, 申迪, 曾子铭, 廖扬, 王迅, 薛斌, 刘书杰, 王书祥, 杨英魁. 不同精粗比对牦牛粪便菌群结构的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(12): 189-197. 吴刀知才让, 裴成芳, 马志远, 刘红山, 曹旭亮, 刘虎, 周建伟. 燕麦干草不同饲喂水平对牦牛日增重、血液生理生化指标及瘤胃发酵参数的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(11): 119-129. 段嘉钰, 张博, 操君, 刘书杰, 崔占鸿. 70~100 kg牦牛犊牛钠、钾、镁元素分布规律及生长需要量 [J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(11): 130-139. 马士龙, 李小伟, 李响, 谢书琼, 刘益丽, 唐娇, 江明锋. 基于GBS简化基因组测序评估3个麦洼牦牛保种群的遗传结构研究 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(9): 183-194. 游茵洁, 周浩珍, 刘垚, 王晨曦, 彭忠利. 燕麦干草、青贮燕麦与天然牧草饲喂牦牛的营养价值比较研究 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(8): 99-110. 戴东文, 庞凯悦, 王迅, 杨英魁, 柴沙驼, 王书祥. 精料补饲水平对暖季放牧牦牛瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(5): 169-177. 孙彩彩, 董全民, 刘文亭, 冯斌, 时光, 刘玉祯, 俞旸, 张春平, 张小芳, 李彩弟, 杨增增, 杨晓霞. 放牧方式对青藏高原高寒草地土壤节肢动物群落结构和多样性的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 62-75. 周力, 王志有, 杨葆春, 侯生珍, 张峰硕, 桂林生. 饲粮中性洗涤纤维水平对黑藏羊肌纤维类型组成比例与肉质特性的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 75-85. 程燕明, 马红彬, 马菁, 马子元, 刘进娣, 周瑶, 彭文栋. 不同放牧方式对荒漠草原土壤碳氮储量及固持的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(10): 18-27. 王永宏, 田黎明, 艾鷖, 陈仕勇, 泽让东科. 短期牦牛放牧对青藏高原高寒草地土壤真菌群落的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(10): 41-52. 李晨, Ahmad Anum Ali, 张剑搏, 梁泽毅, 丁学智, 阎萍. 冷季牦牛和黄牛采食行为、血清生化指标与瘤胃发酵参数的比较研究 [J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 162-169. 纪会, 官久强, 王会, 周建旭, 阿农呷, 何宗伟, 樊珍详, 邱龙康, 曹诗晓, 安添午, 柏琴, 钟金城, 罗晓林. 亚丁牦牛和拉日马牦牛遗传多样性及遗传结构分析 [J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 134-145. 李蒋伟, 王志有, 侯生珍, 雷云, 贾建磊, 周力, 桂林生. 日粮精粗比对育肥藏羊瘤胃组织形态及微生物菌群的影响 [J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 100-109.