添加链接
link管理
链接快照平台
  • 输入网页链接,自动生成快照
  • 标签化管理网页链接
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. Share Crystal structures of an Escherichia coli clamp loader have provided insight into the mechanism by which this molecular machine assembles ring-shaped sliding clamps onto DNA. The contributions made to the clamp loading reaction by two subunits, chi and psi, which are not present in the crystal structures, were determined by measuring the activities of three forms of the clamp loader, gamma(3)deltadelta', gamma(3)deltadelta'psi, and gamma(3)deltadelta'psichi. The psi subunit is important for stabilizing an ATP-induced conformational state with high affinity for DNA, whereas the chi subunit does not contribute directly to clamp loading in our assays lacking single-stranded DNA-binding protein. The psi subunit also increases the affinity of the clamp loader for the clamp in assays in which ATPgammaS is substituted for ATP. Interestingly, the affinity of the gamma(3)deltadelta' complex for beta is no greater in the presence than in the absence of ATPgammaS. A role for psi in stabilizing or promoting ATP- and ATPgammaS-induced conformational changes may explain why large conformational differences were not seen in gamma(3)deltadelta' structures with and without bound ATPgammaS. The beta clamp partially compensates for the activity of psi when this subunit is not present and possibly serves as a scaffold on which the clamp loader adopts the appropriate conformation for DNA binding and clamp loading. Results from our work and others suggest that the psi subunit may introduce a temporal order to the clamp loading reaction in which clamp binding precedes DNA binding. Hingorani MM, et al. J Biol Chem. 1998 Sep 18;273(38):24550-63. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.38.24550. J Biol Chem. 1998. PMID: 9733750 Gulbis JM, et al. Eur J Biochem. 2004 Jan;271(2):439-49. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03944.x. Eur J Biochem. 2004. PMID: 14717711 Ason B, et al. J Biol Chem. 2003 Mar 21;278(12):10033-40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211741200. Epub 2003 Jan 8. J Biol Chem. 2003. PMID: 12519754 Bloom LB. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2006 May-Jun;41(3):179-208. doi: 10.1080/10409230600648751. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2006. PMID: 16760017 Bowman GD, et al. FEBS Lett. 2005 Feb 7;579(4):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.038. FEBS Lett. 2005. PMID: 15680964 Simonsen S, et al. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024 May 30;81(1):245. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05252-w. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024. PMID: 38814467 Free PMC article. Review. Cooper DL, et al. mBio. 2021 Mar 9;12(2):e00184-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00184-21. mBio. 2021. PMID: 33688004 Free PMC article. Sutera VA, et al. DNA Repair (Amst). 2021 Apr;100:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.103006. Epub 2021 Feb 2. DNA Repair (Amst). 2021. PMID: 33582602 Free PMC article. Monachino E, et al. Mol Cell. 2020 Jul 2;79(1):140-154.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 27. Mol Cell. 2020. PMID: 32464091 Free PMC article. Tondnevis F, et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):1691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55118-6. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32015389 Free PMC article.